The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.
Identifieur interne : 000F24 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000F23; suivant : 000F25The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.
Auteurs : Deanna Hanson-Abromeit [États-Unis] ; Kimberly Sena MooreSource :
- Journal of music therapy [ 0022-2917 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Humains (MeSH), Littérature de revue comme sujet (MeSH), Musicothérapie (organisation et administration), Médecine factuelle (organisation et administration), Plan de recherche (MeSH), Périodiques comme sujet (MeSH), Recherche biomédicale (organisation et administration), Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH).
- MESH :
- organisation et administration : Musicothérapie, Médecine factuelle, Recherche biomédicale.
- Humains, Littérature de revue comme sujet, Plan de recherche, Périodiques comme sujet, Reproductibilité des résultats.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Biomedical Research (organization & administration), Evidence-Based Medicine (organization & administration), Humans (MeSH), Music Therapy (organization & administration), Outcome Assessment, Health Care (MeSH), Periodicals as Topic (MeSH), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Research Design (MeSH), Review Literature as Topic (MeSH).
- MESH :
- organization & administration : Biomedical Research, Evidence-Based Medicine, Music Therapy.
- Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Periodicals as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Music therapists are challenged to present evidence on the efficacy of music therapy treatment and incorporate the best available research evidence to make informed healthcare and treatment decisions. Higher standards of evidence can come from a variety of sources including systematic reviews.
OBJECTIVE
To define and describe a range of research review methods using examples from music therapy and related literature, with emphasis on the systematic review. In addition, the authors provide a detailed overview of methodological processes for conducting and reporting systematic reviews in music therapy.
METHODS
The systematic review process is described in five steps. Step 1 identifies the research plan and operationalized research question(s). Step 2 illustrates the identification and organization of the existing literature related to the question(s). Step 3 details coding of data extracted from the literature. Step 4 explains the synthesis of coded findings and analysis to answer the research question(s). Step 5 describes the strength of evidence evaluation and results presentation for practice recommendations.
RESULTS
Music therapists are encouraged to develop and conduct systematic reviews. This methodology contributes to review outcome credibility and can determine how information is interpreted and used by clinicians, clients or patients, and policy makers.
CONCLUSIONS
A systematic review is a methodologically rigorous research method used to organize and evaluate extant literature related to a clinical problem. Systematic reviews can assist music therapists in managing the ever-increasing literature, making well-informed evidence based practice and research decisions, and translating existing music-based and nonmusic based literature to clinical practice and research development.
DOI: 10.1093/jmt/thu002
PubMed: 25014922
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.</title><author><name sortKey="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" sort="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" uniqKey="Hanson Abromeit D" first="Deanna" last="Hanson-Abromeit">Deanna Hanson-Abromeit</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City dhansonabromeit@ku.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sena Moore, Kimberly" sort="Sena Moore, Kimberly" uniqKey="Sena Moore K" first="Kimberly" last="Sena Moore">Kimberly Sena Moore</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25014922</idno><idno type="pmid">25014922</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/jmt/thu002</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000F64</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F64</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F64</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000F64</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F64</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.</title><author><name sortKey="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" sort="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" uniqKey="Hanson Abromeit D" first="Deanna" last="Hanson-Abromeit">Deanna Hanson-Abromeit</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City dhansonabromeit@ku.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sena Moore, Kimberly" sort="Sena Moore, Kimberly" uniqKey="Sena Moore K" first="Kimberly" last="Sena Moore">Kimberly Sena Moore</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of music therapy</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-2917</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomedical Research (organization & administration)</term><term>Evidence-Based Medicine (organization & administration)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Music Therapy (organization & administration)</term><term>Outcome Assessment, Health Care (MeSH)</term><term>Periodicals as Topic (MeSH)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term><term>Research Design (MeSH)</term><term>Review Literature as Topic (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Littérature de revue comme sujet (MeSH)</term><term>Musicothérapie (organisation et administration)</term><term>Médecine factuelle (organisation et administration)</term><term>Plan de recherche (MeSH)</term><term>Périodiques comme sujet (MeSH)</term><term>Recherche biomédicale (organisation et administration)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr"><term>Musicothérapie</term><term>Médecine factuelle</term><term>Recherche biomédicale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomedical Research</term><term>Evidence-Based Medicine</term><term>Music Therapy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</term><term>Periodicals as Topic</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Research Design</term><term>Review Literature as Topic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Littérature de revue comme sujet</term><term>Plan de recherche</term><term>Périodiques comme sujet</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Music therapists are challenged to present evidence on the efficacy of music therapy treatment and incorporate the best available research evidence to make informed healthcare and treatment decisions. Higher standards of evidence can come from a variety of sources including systematic reviews.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>To define and describe a range of research review methods using examples from music therapy and related literature, with emphasis on the systematic review. In addition, the authors provide a detailed overview of methodological processes for conducting and reporting systematic reviews in music therapy.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>The systematic review process is described in five steps. Step 1 identifies the research plan and operationalized research question(s). Step 2 illustrates the identification and organization of the existing literature related to the question(s). Step 3 details coding of data extracted from the literature. Step 4 explains the synthesis of coded findings and analysis to answer the research question(s). Step 5 describes the strength of evidence evaluation and results presentation for practice recommendations.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Music therapists are encouraged to develop and conduct systematic reviews. This methodology contributes to review outcome credibility and can determine how information is interpreted and used by clinicians, clients or patients, and policy makers.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>A systematic review is a methodologically rigorous research method used to organize and evaluate extant literature related to a clinical problem. Systematic reviews can assist music therapists in managing the ever-increasing literature, making well-informed evidence based practice and research decisions, and translating existing music-based and nonmusic based literature to clinical practice and research development.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25014922</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-2917</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>51</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Season>Spring</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of music therapy</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Music Ther</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>4-38</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1093/jmt/thu002</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Music therapists are challenged to present evidence on the efficacy of music therapy treatment and incorporate the best available research evidence to make informed healthcare and treatment decisions. Higher standards of evidence can come from a variety of sources including systematic reviews.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To define and describe a range of research review methods using examples from music therapy and related literature, with emphasis on the systematic review. In addition, the authors provide a detailed overview of methodological processes for conducting and reporting systematic reviews in music therapy.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The systematic review process is described in five steps. Step 1 identifies the research plan and operationalized research question(s). Step 2 illustrates the identification and organization of the existing literature related to the question(s). Step 3 details coding of data extracted from the literature. Step 4 explains the synthesis of coded findings and analysis to answer the research question(s). Step 5 describes the strength of evidence evaluation and results presentation for practice recommendations.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Music therapists are encouraged to develop and conduct systematic reviews. This methodology contributes to review outcome credibility and can determine how information is interpreted and used by clinicians, clients or patients, and policy makers.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">A systematic review is a methodologically rigorous research method used to organize and evaluate extant literature related to a clinical problem. Systematic reviews can assist music therapists in managing the ever-increasing literature, making well-informed evidence based practice and research decisions, and translating existing music-based and nonmusic based literature to clinical practice and research development.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© the American Music Therapy Association 2014. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hanson-Abromeit</LastName><ForeName>Deanna</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City dhansonabromeit@ku.edu.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sena Moore</LastName><ForeName>Kimberly</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Music Ther</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0014162</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-2917</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D035843" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomedical Research</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000458" MajorTopicYN="Y">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019317" MajorTopicYN="N">Evidence-Based Medicine</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000458" MajorTopicYN="Y">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009147" MajorTopicYN="N">Music Therapy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000458" MajorTopicYN="Y">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017063" MajorTopicYN="N">Outcome Assessment, Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010506" MajorTopicYN="Y">Periodicals as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012107" MajorTopicYN="N">Research Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012196" MajorTopicYN="Y">Review Literature as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">music therapy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">systematic review</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25014922</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">thu002</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/jmt/thu002</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Sena Moore, Kimberly" sort="Sena Moore, Kimberly" uniqKey="Sena Moore K" first="Kimberly" last="Sena Moore">Kimberly Sena Moore</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" sort="Hanson Abromeit, Deanna" uniqKey="Hanson Abromeit D" first="Deanna" last="Hanson-Abromeit">Deanna Hanson-Abromeit</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25014922
|texte= The systematic review as a research process in music therapy.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25014922" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |